| Sidor om ämnet: < [1 2 3] | Useless words Trådens avsändare: finnword1
|
|---|
matt robinson 
Spanien
Local time: 12:44
Medlem (2010)
Spanska till Engelska
Tom in London wrote:
Sir Tristram, violer d’amores, fr’over the short sea, had passencore rearrived from North Armorica on this side the scraggy isthmus of Europe Minor to wielderfight his penisolate war: nor had topsawyer’s rocks by the stream Oconee exaggerated themselse to Laurens County’s gorgios while they went doublin their mumper all the time: nor avoice from afire bellowsed mishe mishe to tauftauf thuartpeatrick not yet, though venissoon after, had a kidscad buttended a bland old isaac: not yet, though all’s fair in vanessy, were sosie sesthers wroth with twone nathandjoe. Rot a peck of pa’s malt had Jhem or Shen brewed by arclight and rory end to the regginbrow was to be seen ringsome on the aquaface.....
Chepooka or not, words nonetheless.
| | | | Zorana B.
Frankrike
Local time: 12:44
Engelska till Franska
+ ...
| onomatopoeia | Aug 18, 2023 |
Thomas T. Frost wrote:
Baran Keki wrote:
powwow?
Meowwow? My cat thinks it's a word. Can feline words puss-ibly count as words? [Edited at 2023-08-17 12:13 GMT]
may I say that since it's considered an onomatopoeia..It is definitely the coolest word!
| | | | Kay Denney
Frankrike
Local time: 12:44
Franska till Engelska
Zorana B. wrote:
Thomas T. Frost wrote:
Baran Keki wrote:
powwow?
Meowwow? My cat thinks it's a word. Can feline words puss-ibly count as words? [Edited at 2023-08-17 12:13 GMT]
may I say that since it's considered an onomatopoeia..It is definitely the coolest word!
And it's far from useless because cats invest their miaows with a lot of meaning!
| | | | Matthias Brombach
Tyskland
Local time: 12:44
Medlem (2007)
Nederländska till Tyska
+ ...
Michele Fauble wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Lingua 5B wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Tom in London wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Tom in London wrote:
òpidubvè97r is also a word. Tell me it isn't.
[Edited at 2023-08-17 09:26 GMT]
...bears a common acknowledged notion, yes. If not, then not.
Who says?
You. You have to prove that òpidubvè97r is also a word with a commonly acknowledged notion and others would have to confirm.
A word needs to have a meaning. So what you wrote does not qualify.
And who …
...defines the meaning?
A community of speakers.
[Edited at 2023-08-17 18:13 GMT]
Coming back to my question and please feel free to teach me again:
Does "òpidubvè97r" then represent a word, according to your above statement:
And who …
...defines the meaning?
A community of speakers.
| | |
|
|
|
Lingua 5B
Bosnien och Hercegovina
Local time: 12:44
Medlem (2009)
Engelska till Kroatiska
+ ...
| No it doesn’t | Aug 21, 2023 |
If you are able to define its meaning, in clear terms, then it does.
| | | | Matthias Brombach
Tyskland
Local time: 12:44
Medlem (2007)
Nederländska till Tyska
+ ...
Lingua 5B wrote:
If you are able to define its meaning, in clear terms, then it does.
...but then we both agree on my statement you quoted under your headline "Not really" on page 1 and you hereby openly disagree with Tom?
| | | | WolfgangS
Frankrike
Local time: 12:44
Medlem (2007)
Engelska till Tyska
+ ...
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Michele Fauble wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Lingua 5B wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Tom in London wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Tom in London wrote:
òpidubvè97r is also a word. Tell me it isn't.
[Edited at 2023-08-17 09:26 GMT]
...bears a common acknowledged notion, yes. If not, then not.
Who says?
You. You have to prove that òpidubvè97r is also a word with a commonly acknowledged notion and others would have to confirm.
A word needs to have a meaning. So what you wrote does not qualify.
And who …
...defines the meaning?
A community of speakers.
[Edited at 2023-08-17 18:13 GMT]
Coming back to my question and please feel free to teach me again:
Does "òpidubvè97r" then represent a word, according to your above statement:
And who …
...defines the meaning?
A community of speakers.
a word is defined as follows:
A single distinct meaningful element of speech or writing, used with others (or sometimes alone) to form a sentence and typically shown with a space on either side when written or printed
then it's not a word but an agglutination of letters and figures. A word is a "meaningful" element of "speech" (can you pronounce that element Tom calls a word?). But maybe in Klingonian, Dothraki or Sindarin it has a meaning, who knows ...
| | | | | Not a useless word | Aug 21, 2023 |
finnword1 wrote:
One of the most useless words in the English language is "whatsoever". (None whatsoever is already none). Any other nominations for the list?
It may not have a meaning, but I disagree that it is useless as it's used for emphasis. "There is no reason whatsoever" portrays a kind of seething fury that is missing from "there is no reason", which is a bland statement of fact. Going by your logic, words like "really" and "truly" would also be useless.
| | |
|
|
|
Daryo
Storbritannien
Local time: 11:44
Serbiska till Engelska
+ ...
| It does have a meaning | Mar 25 |
WolfgangS wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Michele Fauble wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Lingua 5B wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Tom in London wrote:
Matthias Brombach wrote:
Tom in London wrote:
òpidubvè97r is also a word. Tell me it isn't.
[Edited at 2023-08-17 09:26 GMT]
...bears a common acknowledged notion, yes. If not, then not.
Who says?
You. You have to prove that òpidubvè97r is also a word with a commonly acknowledged notion and others would have to confirm.
A word needs to have a meaning. So what you wrote does not qualify.
And who …
...defines the meaning?
A community of speakers.
[Edited at 2023-08-17 18:13 GMT]
Coming back to my question and please feel free to teach me again:
Does "òpidubvè97r" then represent a word, according to your above statement:
And who …
...defines the meaning?
A community of speakers.
a word is defined as follows:
A single distinct meaningful element of speech or writing, used with others (or sometimes alone) to form a sentence and typically shown with a space on either side when written or printed
then it's not a word but an agglutination of letters and figures. A word is a "meaningful" element of "speech" (can you pronounce that element Tom calls a word?). But maybe in Klingonian, Dothraki or Sindarin it has a meaning, who knows ...
I beg to differ.
òpidubvè97r does have a meaning - it conveys the absence of any meaningful communication whatsoever. Any and every community of speakers can grasp that … So there - you got a meaning and plenty of communities of speakers!
OTOH the 'zero meaning communication' is not really an original idea - politicians of all descriptions – including the non-descript ones – have perfected the art of meaningless communication eons ago.
| | | | | Sidor om ämnet: < [1 2 3] | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Useless words | Pastey |
|---|
Your smart companion app
Pastey is an innovative desktop application that bridges the gap between human expertise and artificial intelligence. With intuitive keyboard shortcuts, Pastey transforms your source text into AI-powered draft translations.
Find out more » |
| | Protemos translation business management system |
|---|
Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.
More info » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
