Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

not found to be medically effective

English answer:

medically ineffective

Added to glossary by Trias (X)
May 26, 2005 00:49
19 yrs ago
1 viewer *
English term

not found to be medically effective

English Science Medical: Health Care
I'd like to make "not found to be medically effective" shorter by changing it with "medically uneffective". But the problem is that i cant find it in google, is it not so commonly used?

Thanks

Context (a letter to a doctor):
However, what medication/therapy do you recommend if the Temodar drug, that he is using now, is later NOT FOUND TO BE MEDICALLY EFFECTIVE and the mass continue to get bigger? I wish to have your advice in this matter.
Change log

May 26, 2005 00:57: Kim Metzger changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"

May 26, 2005 10:23: Mikhail Kropotov changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"

May 26, 2005 13:40: Kim Metzger changed "Field" from "Other" to "Science"

Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

PRO (3): Sven Petersson, Dr Sue Levy (X), Mikhail Kropotov

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Responses

+8
2 mins
Selected

medically ineffective

just change your search from UNeffective to INeffective and you will get plenty of Google hits

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 mins (2005-05-26 00:52:32 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

[PDF] May 3, 2002 Kenneth L. Hooper, Esquire Mitchell & Hooper 107 North ...
Dateiformat: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - HTML-Version
... irreversible condition would be medically ineffective.” The term “medically
ineffective treatment” is defined in § 5-601(n) as a medical procedure ...
www.oag.state.md.us/Healthpol/hooper.pdf - Ähnliche Seiten

[PDF] January 17, 2003 Anita J. Tarzian, Ph.D., RN University of ...
Dateiformat: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - HTML-Version
... have presented a question about the interplay of the “medically ineffective
... a consulting physician thatattempted CPR would be medically ineffective. ...
www.oag.state.md.us/Healthpol/medicallyineffective.pdf
Peer comment(s):

agree marybro : (:>)
5 mins
agree Refugio
21 mins
agree Robert Donahue (X)
24 mins
agree RHELLER
37 mins
agree Francina
45 mins
agree NancyLynn
1 hr
agree Balasubramaniam L.
1 hr
agree Alfa Trans (X)
3 hrs
disagree Sven Petersson : Please see my answer!
4 hrs
agree Vicky Papaprodromou
9 hrs
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thank u all, and thanks for others too"
-1
2 mins

medically ineffective

would be medically ineffective and patient’s advance directive ... *Medically
inappropriate or ineffective treatment, including CPR.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 mins (2005-05-26 00:51:53 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

www.hsc.wvu.edu/chel/ad_forms/ The%20Rationale%20for%20SB%20399_1.pdf

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 mins (2005-05-26 00:52:50 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Placebos medically ineffective! [July 2001] The news has brought some ...
but there are also placebo non-drug therapies, and even placebo surgery
www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scraps/scraps01.htm
Peer comment(s):

disagree Sven Petersson : Please see my answer!
15 hrs
I still agree with SwissTell (:>) Thanks for your comments.
Something went wrong...
22 mins

is found later to be medically ineffective, and the mass continue to get bigger

This is how to reword it...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 mins (2005-05-26 01:12:57 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

is found later on to be....
Peer comment(s):

neutral Refugio : is later found ,,, and the mass continues to grow
3 mins
Something went wrong...
+1
1 hr

"...is later found ineffective..."

Another option!

Patricia
Peer comment(s):

agree Balasubramaniam L. : Yes, the "medically" can also be dropped as drug implies this
37 mins
Thanks Balasubramaniam
agree Mikhail Kropotov
8 hrs
Thanks Mikhail!
disagree Sven Petersson : Please see my answer!
14 hrs
Something went wrong...
+4
1 hr

(later) found to be ineffective

...if the Temodar drug that he is using now is later FOUND TO BE INEFFECTIVE and the mass continues to get bigger?

You don't need 'medically'. You must drop the commas.
'Later' is better placed before 'found'. And add an -s to 'continue'.

47 Google hits for: medicine "later found to be ineffective"

Peer comment(s):

agree Balasubramaniam L. : Sorry, Nick, I didn't see you already had this up here when I put up my answer.
20 mins
Well, it is like a double agree, isn't it? A very good day to you, Bala.
agree jrb
5 hrs
Thank you, Jessica.
agree Mikhail Kropotov
7 hrs
Thank you, Mikhail.
agree Vicky Papaprodromou
8 hrs
Thank you, Vicky.
agree Kim Metzger
11 hrs
Thank you, Kim.
disagree Sven Petersson : Please see my answer! - Answer: Your other points are valid. I only object against "ineffective".
14 hrs
I've already seen your comment, Sven, but I'm only making a simple linguistic point about a simple letter to a doctor. Do you also disagree with the other points I'm making?
Something went wrong...
+1
1 hr

was found to be ineffective

You can even drop "medically" because a drug can't be "ineffective" in any other way, and people will understand that "medically ineffective" is what is meant.
Peer comment(s):

agree Mikhail Kropotov
7 hrs
Thanks.
Something went wrong...
+1
4 hrs

not found to be medically effective

"Found ineffective", "found uneffective", or any variation thereof IS NOT the same as "not found effective". The confidence intervals used in the statistical test of the "effectiveness" are different. See reference!
Or compare with the following two statements:
1. I have proof that he is dishonest.
2. I don't have proof that he is honest.
Would you say that those two sentences communicate the same? Obviously not!
Peer comment(s):

neutral jrb : but there's no direct reference to the (in)effectiveness of the medication as determined by stats here - I understand it as the case of one patient; also your e.g. is different, how about: he was not (found to be) honest/he was (found to be) dishonest?
2 hrs
It may have decreased the growth rate (a form of effectiveness), but that is not known. Did you read the reference?
agree Mikhail Kropotov : You raise a good point. However, it is the original wording that is wrong, and not the one that uses "ineffective". It would be best to correct it. /// Another good point. I think I'll agree with you, although I would still prefer to change it :)
5 hrs
It would be a grave mistake to change it. It is not a translator's task to change the content of the text. "Not found to be effective" is a very clear and well defined standard phrase.
neutral Drunya : Good point, but the true difference between "not found effective" and "found ineffective" can apply only to large, statistically analyzed studies. Here is a single case report: a drug has not affected the tumor size. Why not claim ineffectiveneness?
8 hrs
Would it be fair to claim that your spouse was unfaithful because you could not prove that he/she was faithful? - Same stuff!
Something went wrong...
7 hrs

has not been effective/proves ineffective

It is not clear whether the original statement means that the drug did not have the desired effect in this particular patient or that its effectiveness has not been demonstrated in drug trials.

If the former is true you could say:
... what medication/therapy do you recommend if Temodar, the drug that he is using now, PROVES INEFFECTIVE and the mass continues to grow?

Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search