Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
prior art
Swedish translation:
teknikens ståndpunkt
Added to glossary by
Anna-Marta Vlugt
Jun 12, 2004 13:02
19 yrs ago
3 viewers *
English term
art document
English to Swedish
Law/Patents
Law: Taxation & Customs
patents�kning
Kontexten är "The YO opposition gives a detailed explanation of different prior art documents and concludes that none of the claims are patentable."
Proposed translations
(Swedish)
5 | handling rörande teknikens ståndpunkt | EKM |
2 | konsthandling | Fabio Descalzi |
Proposed translations
4 hrs
English term (edited):
prior art document
Selected
handling rörande teknikens ståndpunkt
"Prior art" heter på svenska "teknikens ståndpunkt".
Saxat från http://www.prv.se/om_prv/ordlista/p-t.html :
"teknikens ståndpunkt
är helt enkelt all hittills känd teknik. Vid patentbarhetsbedömningar utgår man från teknikens ståndpunkt för att kunna avgöra om uppfinningen lever upp till kraven om "nyhet" och "uppfinningshöjd"."
Saxat från http://www.iusmentis.com/patents/priorart/
"While there are many different grounds on which a patent can be invalidated, the most common one is that the invention is found to be not novel or obvious in the light of the prior art. As the claims are used to define the scope of protection granted by a patent, this can only occur if the patent's claims are not novel or obvious. So, to get a patent invalidated, the first step is to locate documents that can be considered "prior art" against the patent's claims. Prior art basically means any disclosure of the contents of a claim, prior to the application for patent.
National patent laws provide various definitions of what constitutes prior art and in which situations. For example, not all countries recognize oral disclosures as prior art, and others provide grace periods during which the inventor may publish his invention without the publication counting as prior art against his later patent application. Additionally, the Paris Convention provides so-called priority rights, which give an inventor one year to file patent applications after he filed the first one, without endangering the novelty of his invention."
Man hänvisar alltså till teknikens nuvarande nivå för att avslå patentansökningen - den anses inte tillföra något nytt till redan existerande vetande/teknik.
Saxat från http://www.prv.se/om_prv/ordlista/p-t.html :
"teknikens ståndpunkt
är helt enkelt all hittills känd teknik. Vid patentbarhetsbedömningar utgår man från teknikens ståndpunkt för att kunna avgöra om uppfinningen lever upp till kraven om "nyhet" och "uppfinningshöjd"."
Saxat från http://www.iusmentis.com/patents/priorart/
"While there are many different grounds on which a patent can be invalidated, the most common one is that the invention is found to be not novel or obvious in the light of the prior art. As the claims are used to define the scope of protection granted by a patent, this can only occur if the patent's claims are not novel or obvious. So, to get a patent invalidated, the first step is to locate documents that can be considered "prior art" against the patent's claims. Prior art basically means any disclosure of the contents of a claim, prior to the application for patent.
National patent laws provide various definitions of what constitutes prior art and in which situations. For example, not all countries recognize oral disclosures as prior art, and others provide grace periods during which the inventor may publish his invention without the publication counting as prior art against his later patent application. Additionally, the Paris Convention provides so-called priority rights, which give an inventor one year to file patent applications after he filed the first one, without endangering the novelty of his invention."
Man hänvisar alltså till teknikens nuvarande nivå för att avslå patentansökningen - den anses inte tillföra något nytt till redan existerande vetande/teknik.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Jättestort tack!"
51 mins
konsthandling
Declined
document can be translated into "handling" or "intyg", but I think the most appropriate is handling, since intyg has a meaning of "certificate", of something that has already been registered.
Comment: "Eftersom det handlar om patentansökan så tror jag inte art översätts med konst i det här fallet. Men tack ändå."
Something went wrong...